Science confirms it: men are not smarter than women

---

In the artificial sex war on whether men are from Mars and the women of Venus, the possible differences of perception always arise.Among them, some have sustained for great periods of time of humanity that men have been smarter than women.It even contributed as a key argument that the size of the brain of human men is greater than that of women (approximately 11 %).

In response, the biochemist Charles Alexander Pasternak has published a book (Androcentrism: The Ascendancy of Man) in which he reviews each era of humanity with evidence that cancels any type of doubt about the equality of potential intelligence between people of different gender.

The director of the International Biomedic Center of Oxford has used his knowledge about biochemistry to review the evolution of the roles of both sexes while analyzing the possible differences.From the Neolithic, the author reviews the evidence that women have been independent and strong when it comes to decisions."It presents societies from all over the world in which there has been true equality between the sexes and even shows us times in which the matriarchy has flourished," says Diane Lebow, a professor of studying women at the Cañada de Estadada school at the Cañada College of StatesJoined.

Charles Pasternak reviews the role of each other to point out that there are no biological evidence that supports the theory that men are smarter than females.In addition, the researcher portrays as often their elections demonstrate greater intellectual and moral capacity, while men favor the elaboration of unequal laws and the social myth that they are smarter.In the scientific field, brain size has been shown that it is not indicative of the intelligence of the human being.

The book is built with a bibliography and sources that the author brings to those who want to check these tests."Although there is no single explanation, with such a complete and timely review, this study helps us better understand the problems and moves us away from erroneous conclusions," says Diane Lebow, an expert in gender studies.

Social myth, not a scientific theory

It is not something new for the expert's research field.Charles Pasternak had deepened the study of the brain and cellular and molecular biology with several publications on the biochemistry of the brain during his 15 years working in the biochemistry department of the University of Oxford.

Finally, his conclusion is that the androcentrist vision has ended up building a fallacy that had dressed as a scientist.According to the tests offered by Pastenak, men are not smarter than women.However, the author acknowledges that it will be difficult to abandon this theory that has been fed during the last 5.000 years, as you remember in your book.

Contenidos relacionados¿Qué es la recuperación activa del cerebro?Los libros sanan al cerebro, según un expertoLos cacahuetes mejoran la capacidad del cerebro This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io